Sorry, this story is unavailable
The editor says.... @ 7ton: Allowing any more comments will only set the vicious circle back in motion. Please move on...
Posted 09:47 17th February 2012
The editor says.... @makemehappy & 7ton. That's enough from both of you, thanks.
Posted 13:07 15th February 2012
Ref.my post 01.47 14th Feb and previous. My argument is all there. Say"shut up" as many times as you like but you can't dodge or deny it.
Oh and Happy Valentines Day!
Posted 21:55 14th February 2012
@7ton - the stage was there for everyone to leave quietly. You chose to ignore the option. You have shown yourself to be a fool. Well done! Any further posts to this thread I will find intimidatory. You try pathetically to steer this conversation away from the fact that you had no argument in the first place! Thank-you! Further comments will just result in me posting "Shut up". There is no point in saying anything more constructive than that to an idiot who cannot argue their point.
Posted 13:09 14th February 2012
I would really find your ducking and diving quite hilarious apart from the fact that we are talking about serious injuries.
Now read back through these posts and you may just realise what a clown you have been
Here is just a brief description
at 10.43 10th feb I queried your comments to keste and you responded with a rant and insults about me drinking. Later you said it was because you felt insulted because I had called your remarks "utter rubbish"
It was then pointed out to you that I never called your remarks "utter rubbish" but that you had in fact called kestes remarks "utter rubbish" hence you were mistaken.
Instead of being man enough to own up you then denied you made a mistake and just blundered on and on with one silly remark after the other.
Your incorrect comment about punctuation remarks was really hilarious
No doubt you are going to come back with another response full of the usual incorrect nonsense and making things up but it will be no use as you have made clear you can not follow a logical line of debate and I can't take you seriously.
Thanks for the entertainment.
Oh and don't come back and say you "asked me to finish this" You just can't let things lie" as you can finish it yourself by simply not responding with your usual remarks.
The whole thing would have been finished ages ago if you had just followed a sensible and rational line of debate
Posted 01:47 14th February 2012
@7ton - I'm delighted to end this conversation, but think there's quite a few matters that you've been incorrect on. As far as I'm concerned you've not addressed a number of points. You think I've been incorrect with things too, and no doubt that I haven't addressed issues. So time to end this indeed, as there's no chance of either of us agreeing! I look forward to discussing our Triple Crown though!
Posted 13:07 13th February 2012
I said my post was written and I posted it before your post actually appeared on this forum
I did not say that I actually wrote it before you wrote yours. I'm sure you understand that when you write and post a comment it does not appear here instantly hence responses can cross over.
Justice explained what he really meant by his first comments in his second comment. 08.21 12feb. You can not argue or "wriggle" out of that or are you just reading what you want to read and disregarding the rest.
As for gouging and tip tackling I repeat I have not expressed any opinion on which is worse or whether they are the same. I simply queried your comment "one loses and eye, and one results in a bump (who ever breaks their neck in that sort of situation)." and stated that "both can result in serious injury".
You have followed that up with one inaccurate statement about what I have said or done after the other. Like "what utter rubbish" and punctuation marks and so on.
Now if you really want to end this ridiculous thread than stop saying things that are not true and don't try to claim you did not make a mistake like in your comment at 08.21 12 feb
BTW thank you I did enjoy the celebration and I hope you did as well
Posted 23:45 12th February 2012
@justice_4_all - Both are terrible things. I've clearly been talking about the likelihood of serious injury. This I believe is endorsed by the relative sanctions against the offences. But enough said. You have a beer on me too!
Posted 22:16 12th February 2012
@7ton - enjoy the celebration, as I shall. I'm not going to say anymore than these three points:-
1) Gouging is more dangerous than tip tackling - I trust you don't need to comment on that further
2) @justice_4_all said what he said in his first post and was quite clear - again I don't think you need comment.
3) You state your post was before mine. 12:21 (my post) is before 12:39 (your post) I believe.
I don't need to wriggle as I'm happy with my original comment, that you then contested. Again, you do not need to comment.
Now lets just move on (third time of asking) and enjoy a good win! All the best.
Posted 18:16 12th February 2012
Just use a bit of sense for a change my last post was written and posted before yours appeared. It was not a response to your last post.
Read back and you will find I already have taken up the comments with justice_4_all re the drink and stupidity and you know his reply.
It is you who can't let things die unless it is on your terms of course with you having your last say and presuming everyone should agree with you.
Now if you don't mind I am going of to have a drink to celebrate a great game and win by Wales v Scotland.
No doubt you will respond with a lot more wriggeling
Posted 17:39 12th February 2012
@7ton - "I think 7ton is wrong!" - I believe that is a direct quote.
You couldn't let matters lie could you, even though I suggested in my last post that you should! I believe that he also confirmed drink wasn't involved, that stupidity was. Since the drink remarks were aimed at you, it is logical I believe that the stupidity remark was too. I can't see another interpretation of that sentence. I suggest that you take that up with justice_4_all as opposed to me.
I note that yet again you haven't commented on the key points in my last post. So I trust you agree that gouging is generally far more dangerous than a tip tackle. We're all happy therefore, so lets end this discussion, please!
I was certainly polite in my last post to you both. One of you is making me wonder why I bothered.
Posted 14:50 12th February 2012
Yet another mistake by you in thinking there were 2 of you who thought I was wrong.
More wriggleing I suppose
Posted 12:39 12th February 2012
@7ton and @justice_4_all - thank you for the rude and very insulting remarks. Lets just wind back the clock. I placed comments on here to indicate that gouging is far more dangerous than a tip tackle (especially the one we witnessed, which though bad was unlikely to result in serious injury).
I'd suggest that only some who is pig (well we all might as well join in) ignorant wouldn't appreicate that.
That really is the crux of this whole matter. So no more rude remarks. If you can't appreciate the stance with regards to the relative dangers of both (and just to make you both happy, I'm not referring that either of you don't understand), then I'd suggest you are deluded!
@7ton - you seem to have forgotten that you seemed very confused by my remarks, in your opening comments. I can't imagine how any one would be!
Time to move on I hope for all three of us. There's a good match to watch, and there's another thread where we can give the froggies a piece of our minds about their disasterous handling of yesterdays game!
Have a good day both (I trust that proves I'm not stuck in 'such a frame of mind'.
Posted 12:21 12th February 2012
You have summed things up perfectly especially your pig comments and I think makemehappy has confirmed this with his comment at 08.21
Posted 11:43 12th February 2012
Trip to Specsavers?
Quotation marks?? Well take a good look I did use quotation marks around your statement after my reference to @keste which I copied and pasted hence it includes your spelling mistake of "and instead of an"
I don't usually bother commenting about grammar or spelling as it has nothing to do with someone's point of view and it is rather petty to comment on it.
However since you brought it up you better be a bit more careful with yours
Posted 11:03 12th February 2012
@7ton - No mistake by me - sadly you are just talking utter rubbish. My only mistake is to think that you could be understood. Glad there's two of us that think you are wrong!
Posted 08:21 12th February 2012
Sorry to sound silly but I assume you are saying I am wrong about the drinking and not that both eye gouging or tip tackles can cause serious injury
Posted 22:35 11th February 2012
Dear oh dear! Here you go making things up again and accusing me of saying things I never did
I will make this as simple as I can.
I never stated "what utter rubbish" as a comment from myself but simply pointed out that, that is what you said to keste re your post 18.04 8th Feb.
Here it is again "@Keste03 - what utter rubbish! Have a good think - one loses and eye, and one results in a bump (who ever breaks their neck in that sort of situation).
Now you did say that didn't you?
I simply asked you what you were on about in regards to those comments to keste
when both eye gouging and what Bradley done can both result in serious injury including broken necks. ref my post 10.43 10th Feb.
I never stated one was as bad as the other or anything else.
Why do you say my question was such rubbish and go on about drinking, telling me to grow up, calling me rude then claim you have not insulted me but feel insulted yourself ?
What sort of a response to a simple question is that?
Now who has made the mistake???
Posted 21:55 11th February 2012
@justice_4_all - I note that 7ton did not use any quote marks around the "rubbish" comment. Clearly neither of you realise that that is appropriate. I trust that the stupidity remarks are not aimed me. Im sure they are not. Thanks for confirming 7ton is wrong! Also thanks for using quotation marks. Its good to see someone knows how to write!
Posted 20:15 11th February 2012
@7ton - what are you on about? Don't get all irrate just because you now realise you made a mistake LOL! You stated "what utter rubbish" in a previous remark. I pointed out clearly that your remarks were absurd. I note you have been unable to respond to my argument, which shows that you can't. You are right (but it is obvious) that both acts can result in serious injury. However, you obviously don't realise that one is more likely to than the other (you appear to accept this now, which suggests you know your original comment, about my claims being rubbish, no longer applies). I was not ranting, but I was saddened to think that someone could be as naive as you.
I did not go off on a tangent either - sorry you've not supplied any evidence (AGAIN).
So have another go - what exactly is rubbish about my comments? And go on, address the other points I have made! (No doubt you will go - what points, your going off on a tangent again LOL). Grow up and face facts.
Apologies for the drinking remark. I presumed you drink must have resulted in such foolish comments. I have not insulted you, but I have been insulted that someone states my initial claims are rubbish - you must have been having a rant. Now time to move on and enjoy the rugby, and for you to stop being so rude and naive!
Posted 10:16 11th February 2012